Category Archives: CANUCKS – RON SPENCE


by Ron Spence

I watched the game in a liquor establishment – the Fifth St. Bar and Grill – in Victoria.

And, the cliental weren’t kind to Roberto during the first part of the game. It was as though he had been personally letting them down.

This had changed, however, by the end of the contest.

Willie Mitchell’s big hit sends a message to future opponents and Shane O’Brien was +1 and took only one penalty in a game that would have provoked his lack of discipline in the past. He has only 10 penalty minutes in 9 games – this season – and is a team best +4.

I’m still happy with the Ehrhoff trade – although he was -2 last night – and see Aaron Rome coming along – at a 6th man level.

Bieksa and Edler are horses with 24.55 and 23.58 minutes for the contest, and when they get their games this season, the D will be what I thought it would be.

Mikael Samuelsson continues to impress, as does Henrik.

I’ve enjoyed watching coach V’s speed line, but wish that Mason Raymond would focus on his defense.

I have really enjoyed watching Michael Grabner over the past three games – seeing brief glimpses in his first contest, then bursts of speed in his second and success in his third.

I had heard that he stayed out of traffic, but with Kesler and Raymond leading the charge he is willing to take hits. And, his shot is as good as it was billed.

The Chicago game was a key one for both Roberto and the Canucks – something for the captain to build on.


I hope that Andrew Raycroft gets to face his former team – the Leafs.

I think that the boys would play really hard to help him win.


by Ron Spence

I used to get this knot in my stomach: whenever Brent Sopel had the puck; and when Felix Potvin and Dan Cloutier were in goal.

I now have this same feeling when Roberto is between the pipes.

It’s not a conscious reaction – it’s the result of Roberto’s suspect play – so far this season – and against the Blackhawks during the playoffs.

My respect for Henrik continues. He was only 41 % in faceoffs, but logged 21 minutes, including a minute and a half when the team was shorthanded. He played hard and looks somewhat injured.

Mikael Samuelsson continues to show his patience and scored another goal – his 4th (He now has 7 points in 7 games – but is -2.).

I am very happy with the speed line.

Coach V is giving Michael Grabner the opportunity to play his game. Led by Ryan Kesler’s grit and 11 wins vs. 7 losses in the playoff circle, they played well. Ryan had 8 shots on net, Mason Raymond 6 and Grabner 3.

Alexandre Bolduc was a good callup, and I believe plays smarter than Glass.

Both Alexandre Burrows and Kevin Bieksa had better games. Both were +2, and Burrows had 20:51 in ice time and Bieksa blocked two shots.

Aaron Rome was quicker – albeit against slower forecheckers – and blocked 3 shots, and had some good zingers from the point.

Ryan Johnson did what he does best, was 5 and 2 in the faceoff circle, but only blocked one shot.

Alexander Edler continued to play his somewhat uneven game, but logged a team high 26:50 minutes.

Steve Bernier used to lead San Jose in hits, but never touched anyone during the Calgary or Minnesota games.


vs. Calgary


vs. Minnesota


vs. Dallas


And yet, the power forward had four hits against Dallas.

If Bernier wants ice time on the top two lines, he has to play a consistent physical game.


by Ron Spence

In their defense, the Canucks had a five day layoff and were facing one of the NHL’s best defenses.

But still, they looked really bad for most of the game.

I wanted to note a few points based on the past two contests.

Kevin Bieksa has been terrible.

Aaron Rome didn’t have the game that he wanted – was -3 – mainly because he wasn’t moving fast enough. In a game of time and space, he was playing at an AHL level. But, I know that he has a 6th Dman’s skills and speed and just has to uptempo his game. He doesn’t concern me.

Alex Edler – -2 – improves and then levels off. That’s his learning curve and his game against Calgary wasn’t a move upwards.

Willie Mitchell was playing his usual game, but was better against Dallas than Calgary.

Christian Ehrhoff is playing better than I thought he would – based on comments from San Jose after he was traded.

Shane O’Brien hasn’t improved his game from last season to this campaign. However, in a rough game he didn’t retaliate, which is a positive sign.

Vancouver misses my man Mattias, and Sami Salo.

And Henrik, who had 2 points last night – and was plus 2 – misses Daniel. It would have been a different game had both the twins been playing.

Alex Burrows has to give his head a shake. He had mental lapses in both the Dallas and Calgary games.

Both Steve Bernier and Mason Raymond had moments when they were playing well, but didn’t sustain.

Kyle Wellwood has really impressed me in his own end. He will get his offense going soon.

I liked what I saw of Michael Grabner. He was tentative but didn’t look out of place.

Is Ryan Kesler injured?

Mikael Samuelsson has played like a pro – even, game in and game out.

Roberto disturbs me, based on the occasional lapses that I have seen over the past three or four seasons.

He has had two so so games in this young season. He can forget about a spot in the Olympics.

I think that Mike Gillis has to re-evaluate his fourth line.

In two games against Calgary – this season – they were soundly beaten by their opponents. Hordichuk and Tanner Glass were -2 last night.

It’s my hope that Matt Pettinger plays well in Manitoba and can be signed for the minimum and replace Glass who is clearly an AHL player.

To me, the plus from the Calgary game was that Andrew Raycroft had his second outing as a Canuck and I thought that he played well. Confidence is what he needs, and Roberto’s play has given him some ice time.


by Ron Spence

“It was kind of a freak thing,” coach Jacques Martin said. “It wasn’t on a hit or anything.”

“He was just skating up the ice.”

The Ottawa coach was talking about his young Finnish Dman who had just injured himself during a 2001 exhibition game.

Eight years later, Sami Salo is still having freak injuries.

Vancouver was playing in the 2nd game of the 2nd round of the 2008-09 playoffs, and Salo unleashed a slapshot which lasered past Nikolai Khabibulin’s glove hand.

It was Salo’s 3rd goal and 6th point in five playoff games, and Salo had injured himself once again. This time, he had pulled buttocks muscles and had to leave the game only 5:35 minutes into the contest.

Sami Salo has reportedly had “thirty-seven significant injuries in a 10-year career.”

The Fin has missed 216 regular season games over the past decade.

Salo missed 22 games during 2008-09, and coincidentally, his average NHL games lost per season has been 21.6.

That’s more than 26.3% of Ottawa’s/Vancouver’s regular season games each year – with more in the playoffs.

Sami Salo had some pretty serious shoulder injuries from his 1st until his 8th season, and recurring groin injuries from his 1st until his 10th seasons.

There were also injuries to his: ankle, foot, knee and leg, and his wrist and elbow. And, there were injures to his ribs, back and nose.


stats courtesy of

Another facial injury was delivered by Tampa Bay coach Rick Tocchet, who was then playing for Philly.

“Early in the first period [March 27, 2001]  Salo was cross-checked in the face…” wrote CBC.

“For his part, Salo received cracked teeth and a concussion, described by Senators coach Jacques Martin as mild that will force him to miss at least Wednesday night’s game….”

Salo’s inventory of injuries doesn’t include the cracked teeth and concussion – and Salo often played injured, which means that some injuries were never recorded – except in the ‘nucks’ records.

Sami isn’t known as a wuss.

“Obviously they have put some hardware into my face and you don’t want to start too early or work out too hard because they might shift,” Salo said. “I have to give it a little time to heal and hopefully by the end of the week we’ll know more and hopefully I can start increasing my workouts.”

He had a metal plate installed in his nose and another helping to hold together his cheekbone after an Alex Edler clearing attempt on November 1st, 2007.

Through it all, Salo has maintained a sense of humour.

During last spring’s playoffs, Sami was being cross-examined by a Chicago writer, about the nature of his injury.

“Maybe it’s just a burning sensation when you pee. You never know,” Salo responded.

That didn’t make the list, either.


It was the recently retired Curtis Joseph who named Sami Salo “the Finnish MacInnis.”


by Ron Spence

There are a number of reasons why Cody Hodgson was returned to the Ontario Hockey League.

Had they kept the under-achieving rookie on their roster, the Canucks would have had to expose another of their forwards on waivers – even if they planned to keep Hodgson in the NHL for only 9 games.


courtesy of

Cody Hodgson might not think that he has anything to learn – back in junior – but he must work on his skating if he wants to be a successful NHLer. The Sedins and Joe Sakic did, just to name three very good players.


courtesy of

It made no sense to waste one of Hodgson’s three entry level – and thus relatively cheap – seasons when he wasn’t ready for the NHL.

With all of his bonuses, Hodgson would have been an expensive 4th liner – who sometimes sat in the press box:


courtesy of


But, most important was Mike Gillis’ ongoing subtext: you have to earn the right to play for the Vancouver Canucks.

Last season the Vancouver GM sent expensive one-way contracts to Manitoba because they didn’t measure up.

heading 03-00-10bottom

This year, Gillis has sent down three Number One draft picks to improve their games (Schneider and Grabner to the AHL, and Hodgson to junior.).

Mike Gillis wants players to be proud of their Canucks’ uniforms.

It’s not just something that players are entitled to because they’ve been drafted in the 1st round.


by Ron Spence

This October’s Canucks are the best in the franchise’s history – in my opinion.

Not that I would want them facing Vancouver’s 1994 playoff squad next week.

The old axiom is that you build your team from the goalie and up through the middle.

And, if Kyle Wellwood plays as well as many of us think he will, the ‘nucks will be as strong as any team – in goal and up the middle.

forwardscourtesy of

My only concern – with the first line – is how Alexandre Burrows will deal with his ups and downs – occasional demotions, etc.

He had an uphill battle from the ECHL, but clawing your way to the top is different than dealing with self-doubt. But, that’s where Ryan Walters comes in (Both Kyle Wellwood and Mason Raymond learned to even out their games last season.).

The second line could be really good, or just good. They have three very competent two way players. And, Sergei Shirokov will benefit from the two week Olympic break.

My concern with Ryan Kesler is one of attitude. I listened to an interview when he was asked about Cody Hodgson and he talked about himself during the whole segment. My concern is that he doesn’t over-inflate his self-importance and demand the really big money that the team can’t afford.

The fourth line is just plain solid – with an enforcer, a shotblocking PK man and some interchangeable grit players.

The third is the line that I enjoy the most.

They were the new kids last season, and we followed their ups-and-downs. Both Wellwood and Bernier were trying to re-establish themselves after Toronto and San Jose/Buffalo, and Raymond was the speedy rook – lots of flash, trying to develop some substance.

At the back end: Alexander Edler is ready for another leap upwards, and Sami found a new rung on his ladder during the playoffs – before injury.

Bieksa must continue to play tough, and Shane O’Brien must continue to play the disciplined game he evolved during the pre-season – only one penalty.

My main concern – on the D – is Christian Ehrhoff and his need for consistency – although he had the most ice time of any San Jose defenseman in their ill-fated series against Ahaheim.


I believe that Andrew Raycroft will flourish. He has the skills, but couldn’t deal with the pressure. But, should Roberto be seriously injured, the Canucks might need some outside help.

Much of Vancouver’s success this season will depend on how, and when, coach V rests Roberto.


And, great team or not, I will miss Mattias Ohlund.


by Ron Spence

I thought he’d be a cross between Nick Lidstrom and Ulfie Samuelsson – in a ‘nucks’ uniform.

He was the Swedish Rookie of the Year – in 1998-99 – and played with an edge.

“Another mean defensive-minded defenseman,” wrote Hockey’s Future, “but more in the Darius Kasparitis mold than Bonni’s up-front toughness. David has slightly more offensive upside than Bonni, but isn’t as big, or strong.”


courtesy of the Vancouver Canucks

David Ytfeldt was drafted under the name of David Jonsson, in the 5th round – 136th overall  – and was one pick behind Andrew Raycroft.

He had been selected for Team Sweden’s Under 18 team – which won a silver medal at the European Junior Cup. That 1996-97 season, he also played in the J20 Superelit – Sweden’s best junior league – for Leksand when he was 17-years-old.

Ytfeldt played another 23 games with Leksand’s J20 squad during the 1997-98 season, then graduated to their elite league squad and played in 10 contests. The Elitserien is Sweden’s top hockey league, and ranked as the fourth best circuit in Europe – after the Russian KHL, the Finnish SM-liiga, and the Czech Extraliga.


swedish rookies

The following 1998-99 season – still playing in the Elitserien circuit – David Ytfeldt was voted the Swedish Rookie of the Year.

(Writer’s Note: Some very good players have won the Rookie award – Henrik Zetterberg, Victor Hedman, etc. I have added a column showing where these award winners played after their selection.)

Also, Ytfeldt played for Team Sweden at the World Juniors – under 20 – Championships and had 4 points in 6 games.


The Canucks were very happy to hear that their draft pick had won the award, but he never came to Vancouver’s prospects camp.

Ytfeldt continued to play for Leksands during the 1999-2000 season – had 72 penalty minutes – and was a brutal -21 in 50 games.

Next, Ytfeldt moved to Finland – to a superior league – but had suffered a back injury and could play in only 11 games. He  returned to Sweden and went down a level to the J20 Superelit for two games in January of 2001.  Later, he returned to the Elitserien – with Frolunda’s top team – and played 9 games and went -7.

This was 2 1/2 years after he had been drafted by the Canucks, and he still hadn’t attended a prospects camp.

Hockey’s Future wrote in the spring of 2001:

“David Ytfeldt would have had a great chance to make the Canucks this past season had he attended Training Camp…If he makes the jump to North America, David will no doubt make a leap on my prospect list. As long as he’s in Sweden playing, though, he’s only a small blip on the Canucks’ radar. ETA: 2004, or never at all.”



It’s interesting that Ytfeldt would leave Sweden to play in a Finnish league, but not go to an NHL camp. And, Vancouver was loaded with Swedes: Naslund, Ohlund, the Sedins. It’s not as though it would have been a difficult place to adapt to.

There was also room on Vancouver’s roster for a 5th or 6th Dman. The top four were: Ohlund, Jovo, Aucoin and Murray Baron.

Greg Hawgood was an AHL standout brought in as a filler, and Chris Joseph and Doug Bodger had seen better days. Vancouver brought in Scott Lachance as a free agent, and traded for Drake Berehowsky. Bryan Allen was recovering from injury and Brent Sopel was taking the ice time that Ytfeldt could have had.

But, David Ytfeldt didn’t do himself, or the Canucks a favour.

By the 2002-03 season, he was playing in Sweden’s second level Northern League – for the Nykoping Hockey team – a squad that was desperately trying to make it to the Elitserien. Playing against less talented rivals, Ytfeldt had 11 points in 15 games.


The following season, he went further down the Swedish hockey ladder – to division two – and played for IFK Stromsund, a kind of club hockey team. He worked as both a player and trainer.

Then Ytfeldt returned to the Leksands area where he works in a gym and wellness centre.

He was asked a few years ago why he stopped playing?

The google translation reads as follows:

“…it was that easy that I have not had the urge to play anymore. I had simply lost the taste…I felt that there were other things I wanted to do in life than to play hockey. That was the biggest reason why I did not play longer than what I did.”

He never mentioned his injuries during this interview.


So, David Ytfeldt – like Keyser Söze – is a mythical character.

The Vancouver faithful heard about him, never saw him play, and never will.

But, his name remains – on the net – battling the usual suspects who come towards his net….


by Ron Spence

The Canucks’ netminding is the best ever.

Roberto has signed a 12 year deal – with a few outs along the way – but has still made a commitment to the franchise – and the fans.

And the best goalie in the AHL is Vancouver’s number two guy.

It’s a long way from Brian Burke’s goalie graveyard.

Now, before I start, I have to say that it was Dave Nonis who brought in Roberto from Florida, and drafted Cory Schneider.

But, it’s Mike Gillis who enticed Roberto into signing for a long time.


Burke inherited a half decent goalie in Garth Snow – not a number one guy by today’s standards.

Snow had been obtained for Sean Burke, who had been obtained for Kirk McLean.

He also had a two-time Allstar in Arturs Irbe, but let him go (I had talked to Arturs many times when he played for Vancouver, and he admitted when he returned to B.C. – with Carolina – that he had wanted to remain a ‘nuck, but was never given an offer.). Archie would go on to star in Carolina and play better than any ‘nucks’ goalie over the next number of seasons.

Arturs had good numbers on the left coast. On a brutal team – 25-43-14 – he was 14-11-6 with a .907 save percentage and a 2.73 GAA.



Burke had to get rid of Pavel Bure – who was doing a Dany Heatley – and picked up Kevin Weeks in the trade.

In 11 games, his first NHL season in Vancouver “The Goalie of the Future” went .868 with 3.83 GAA – and took forever to earn his first win. During the following season, he improved to .898 and 2.86.

That’s when Burke made the first of his reclamation trades. He swapped Weekes and two other players to the New York Islanders for Felix Potvin and two picks – on December 19, 1999. The former darling of Leafs’ fans, had been traded to the Islanders, where he continued to lose his game.

“An all-star, No. 1 goaltender early in his career,” wrote The Sports Forecaster, “Potvin’s past turmoils with the Toronto and Long Island organizations are now considered water under the bridge. A reflex goalie, he needs lots of playing time in order to stay sharp. “The Cat” still has a tendency to stay too deep in his net and is often victimized by soft, back-breaking goals.”

Potvin lasted just over one calendar year – never had a winning record either part seasons – and was traded to L.A for future considerations on February 15, 2001.



Garth Snow lasted in Vancouver for 2 1/2 seasons, and maintained a .900 average, but never had a winning campaign. He was signed by Pittsburgh before the 2000-01 season.

Corey Schab was one goalie who had a winning average during this time – 2-1- but only played in six games, before being sent to the minors. Burke had given Atlanta a 4th round pick for him on October 29, 1999.

Alfie Michaud was a free agent signing who played in Manitoba and made it to the Big Tent for a total of 2 games.



Burke’s second reclamation project was Dan Cloutier. He became Canucks’ property on February 7, 2001, eight days before Felix Potvin was traded.

Vancouver gave up Adrian Aucoin and a 2nd round pick for the former hot prospect.

“At one time considered one of the NHL’s brightest young goaltenders,” wrote The Sports Forecaster, “Cloutier’s career has stalled. Both the New York Rangers and Tampa Bay Lightning gave up on him, so Vancouver may be his last opportunity to seize a No. 1 job. However, his shaky play during the 2000-01 playoffs has put the 25-year-old’s status in doubt. Competitive and fiery, Cloutier must work on his concentration, especially in high traffic. With Bob Essensa out of the picture for 2001-02, the Canucks have given Cloutier a vote of confidence.”

Burke’s second reclamation project was brilliant at moments. He was named the National Hockey League Player of the Week on March 18, 2002, and again on February 17, 2003.

He had a respectable win vs. loss record, but his 2.39 GAA wasn’t particularly stellar.

And, Cloutier was inconsistent, lost his confidence and was traded to L.A.

During the 2000-01 season, the Canucks had an excellent backup who outplayed both Potvin and Cloutier. Bob Essensa went 18-12 and was Vancouver’s best goalie during the playoffs.

But like he did with Arturs Irbe, Burke let Essensa go.



The Martin Brochu backup experiment that followed is up there with the Bill Laforge coaching experiment decades before.

Brochu had been the AHL’s MVP, with 32 wins and a 2.18 GAA the season before.

Brochu was a total flop, however, and Burke picked up free agent Petr Skudra on November 7, 2001. Skudra went 10-8 during his first Vancouver season and 9 and 5 his second campaign. Crawford decided to use Alex Auld rather that Skudra during the 2003 playoffs, so Skudra signed to play in Russia.



Burke picked a good young goalie on May 31, 2001. He gave Florida 2nd and 3rd round picks for Alex Auld.

He would become Vancouver’s best netminder – when Dave Nonis was GM – replacing Dan Cloutier during the 2005-06 season.

Then, he was sent back to the Panthers as part of the Luongo trade on June 23, 2006.



The last victim of the Burke goalie graveyard was Johan Hedberg. He was traded to Vancouver by Pittsburgh for Vancouver’s 2nd round choice. He signed with Dallas following the lockout season, and now plays in Atlanta.


The sad part of the graveyard saga was that there were good goalies that Burke let go, and reclamation projects that he should have stayed away from.

But, I guess if Brian Burke knew more about goalies, he’d still be Vancouver’s GM.

And the Canucks wouldn’t have Roberto – who’s bulldozed the memories of the ‘nucks’ goalie graveyard.


Goalie data compliments of


by Ron Spence

I had made a spreadsheet of Mike Gillis’ empty cupboard last season, and decided to compare it with this year’s prospects – and missing was Charles-Antoine Messier.

I  remembered that he had been a so so prospect, ranked along with Patrick White, Matt Butcher, etc. by Hockey’s Future.


Messier had been drafted in the sixth round by Baie-Comeau in 2005.

messcourtesy of

The 5’11”, 185 pounder had a mediocre rookie season in the Q, but had an impressive 27 goals and 21 assists in 69 names during his sophmore campaign.

This resulted in him being drafted in the 5th round – 145th Overall  – by Vancouver at the 2007 Amateur Draft.

“…Messier is the type of long-shot prospect,” wrote Matt MacInnis, “with solid offensive upside that the team should be making at this stage of the draft considering the giant hole they have at the center position among prospects.”

So, he was drafted for his position and offense.

Charles-Antoine Messier had limitations. He was reasonably fast, but not fast enough for a small centre. His defensive play wasn’t that good, so he couldn’t be used as a two way pivot. He was easily knocked off the puck and inconsistent.

This, as well as his high skill level, were observed at his first rookie training camp.

“Messier wasn’t strong enough although he did pull off several slick moves that caught the attention of the coaching staff,” wrote MacInnis.

A number of Canucks’ fans attending the camp noted examples of Messier’s lack of strength.

Coach Vigneault was encouraging, however: “He’s playing real well, I think we all like his skill level and his speed on his ice, but obviously he’s not ready to make the next step.”

That summer Messier was traded by Baie-Comeau to Acadie-Bathurst.

Messier played just 34 games with the Titans, and was traded once again, this time to Chicoutimi.  He completed the year with 41 points in 66 games – between the two teams – and had 3 points in 4 games during the post-season.

Last season, he was a twenty-year-old and needed to have a good season – “make the next step” – to earn a pro contract. Then, he injured his shoulder and had to miss a number of games.

But, he had good attitude and worked on his fitness.

“It’s been two weeks that I practice on the ice with my teammates,” he said. “Every day, over the last three months, I participated in two training sessions. I did what is called a”circuit” in addition to improving my cardio every night. I also realized how much food is important for a hockey player. This is not necessarily a concept that I applied previously. All the pounds that I lost permit me to be faster. “

During this period, he reduced his weight from 187 to 174 with his diet and intense training.

Messier returned and played in ten games, but collected only one assist.

And because he was an over-aged, under-producer, Chicoutimi released him.

“It’s hard to take,” Messier told Serge Emond. “I have not taken it well. Things were not great…I did not really see it coming…The team does not go very well today. Rather than having a player of 20, who has difficulty in producing, he prefers to give a chance to a younger player.”

Messier admitted that he might have lost his confidence: “I do not want to explain my lack of production by my injury. Perhaps a lack of confidence or pressure. “

After his demotion from Chicoutimi, Messier shopped around other Hockey League Quebec Major Junior teams, but could only find a roster spot one level below – in the League Hockey Junior AAA du Quebec.

Messier admitted that his demotion further hurt his confidence.

“It was hard but, this did not happen for nothing. I am now fully integrated with [the Granby] Inouk. I love playing hockey and I decided to come here to join my two friends, Patrick Rivard and François Lanctôt-Marcotte.”

Messier did well when he first arrived in Granbyenne. He had three assists during one game and seven points in four games.

His coach liked him and immediately made him an assistant captain.

“When a guy arrives with the experience and work ethic that Messier has, [I’ll] give him this role, of course,” commented the coach Patrice Bosc. “It would be easy for him to play the star, but this is not the case….”

The coach was also optimistic that Messier would return to his old form:

“He does lots of little things that nobody sees…he blocks shots, etc.. I look at him go, and I think at the end of the season, he will be at exactly the same level as a player 20-years-old completing his major junior. You can tell just by looking at him handling the puck. “

But, the hard-working Messier still wasn’t scoring.

“The 10th goal was not important for the team but for me, yes,” Messier told Gaetan Roy. “This is not my personal statistics, but for my confidence. For two years, I have a lock to score goals. [Now it] looks like I never make the right decision between pass and shoot. I console myself by saying that even if I did not score a goal, the team wins. “

In 10 games with the Inouk, Messier scored twice and assisted on 12 for 14 points.

His lack of goal scoring led to frustration and he received a suspension for a head attack.

“There is surely a reason for this gesture,” said Messier. “I was frustrated because the games piled up without my trademark. It was a useless gesture. I could have hurt the team. I was glad to see the team win without me.”

The Inouk reached the playoffs, and Charles-Antoine Messier scored two goals along with three assists in one game.

The coach also stated that Messier had played with a broken wrist and an injured groin during the playoff run.

The Vancouver Canucks had until June 1st, 2009 to sign Charles-Antoine Messier, but declined.

He had had one thing going for him – scoring – and had lost it – along with his confidence.

Had he been a Mike Gillis draft, the Canucks might have worked with him a little longer.

But, the ‘nucks cut bait.

Charles-Antoine Messier will be attending Concordia University.


by Ron Spence

There have been some comments to the effect that Brad Lukowich could be dispatched to Manitoba – that he’s not an NHL calibre Dman.

Some San Jose fans were glad to get rid of him.

“I don’t think you’re able to rid yourself of Brad Lukowich without packaging him with Ehrhoff,” wrote fan blog Fear the Fin, “and that was probably a selling point for Wilson- my guess is that the Canucks were pushing for Ehrhoff, and DW countered by saying, ‘We’ll make this move only if you take Lukowich.'”

The numbers show that Lukowich was the 6th Dman with the Sharks.

Last season with San Jose – the President’s Trophy winners with a 53-18-11 record – he played in 58 games and was behind Dan Boyle, Marc-Edouard Vlasic, Rob Blake, Christian Ehrhoff and Doug Murray, with an average ice time of 16.13 minutes per game. He was also +5, the fifth best for Sharks’ Dmen.

During the Sharks’ ill-fated playoffs, he was once again 6th in most D ice time, with an average time of 14.30.

And he was one of only two Sharks to have a positive plus minus – +1 (The Sharks had allowed the Ducks to score 17 goals in 6 games.).


Lukowich, while never a top 4 Dman, has consistently been a number six guy.

He was drafted by the New York Islanders in the 4th round (90th overall) of the 1994 Entry Draft.

He is a good 6th man because he plays within his own game.

luko2courtesy of

Brad Lukowich won a Stanley Cup during his rookie NHL season and averaged 16.18 minutes per game during his 14 game regular campaign. This was behind Derian Hatcher, Sergei Zubov, Richard Matvichuk, Darryl Sydor and Shawn Chambers.

In the post-season, he averaged only 9.60 ice time, also behind Craig Ludwig.

When Lukowich played on the Stanley Cup winning Lightning team – during the 2003-04 season – he averaged 18.45 minutes per game – behind Dan Boyle, Pavel Kubina, Darry Sydor and Jason Cullimore, and just ahead of Cory Sarich.

He also had the 3rd best plus/minus on the team -+29 – and was the top Dman in that category.

Lukowich averaged 15.51 minutes per game during the post season and had the 6th most ice time for a Dman.

In Tampa Bay, the Lightning had thrown the bank at free agent forwards – the summer of 2008 – and had to trade off some of their D.

“…Friday’s trade of Boyle and Brad Lukowich cannot be the end of Tampa Bay’s dealings,” wrote John Romano of the St. Petersburg Times. “The roster has too many spare forwards and not enough quality defenders. If this roster remains intact for the rest of the summer, new owner Oren Koules will literally have no defense.”

Their roster was even thin before they had made the trade with San Jose.

“Carle and Wishart also won’t address the fact that the Lighting blueline was thin before they dealt away Boyle and Lukowich,” wrote Spector of

Still, Tampa Bay used the excuse that they had given up on Lukowich.

“Getting rid of defenseman Brad Lukowich, dealt with Boyle to San Jose, was a good move as he apparently was not in Tampa Bay’s top seven next season,” wrote Damian Cristodero. “Add his cap hit to Boyle’s and subtract Carle’s and you get a significant savings of $4.796-million.”

San Jose, unlike Tampa Bay, has players in their system who can replace Lukowich – at a cheaper price.

And Vancouver can use him until his inflated contract expires next May – and younger players in their system are ready to graduate to the Big Tent.


One criticism made of Lukowich’s play last season was that he performed quite well for the Sharks’ first 20 games and then his play fell off.

If you look at his injuries, he was out day to day with groin problems on December 6th, missed two games on December 13th, was out again day to day with lower body problems on January 10th, and then for 16 games on February 21st.

His nagging injury would definitely count for some of his faltering play. But, he was obviously healthy by the post-season.